United Nations Nuclear Bank
Print
PDF

By Cassandra Anderson
March 24, 2011

UNwarThe media hailed Warren Buffett last December for donating $50 million dollars toward a United Nations nuclear bank with control over uranium enrichment.  The intent is control over nuclear weapons and nuclear power by the elites who are the true forces behind the UN.

The UN nuclear bank will be under the authority of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is NOT independent; it was created through a UN treaty and answers to the UN and the UN Security Council.  The fully funded UN nuclear bank does not require nations to stop uranium enrichment, which was the original plan; however, the final terms have not been set.  The fuel bank will sell enriched uranium for power plants to countries in "good standing".  Therefore, only countries who kow-tow to the UN and IAEA will be provided with enriched uranium. 

The United Nations is a supranational entity that answers to no one.  After WWII, the UN was sold to the public as an voluntary collection of nations committed to peace and ending war.  The UN pretends to vote on issues democratically, but its true goal is a totalitarian world government ruled by the elites at the top.  They are happy to bully countries and go to war over resources, as evidenced by the UN resolution last week to attack Libya.  They claim that war is necessary for peace.

The UN nuclear bank will consolidate power under the UN for nuclear energy and weaponry, which is another piece of UN Agenda 21, the blueprint for total control and depopulation.

UN WORLD DOMINANCE

Four things are needed to take political control over a population (the UN has set its sights on the entire world):

1.  Money
2.  An army
3.  Control over the media
4.  Control over education

If you have enough money and an army, then control over the media and education are useful but not essential.

UN NUCLEAR BANK FINANCING

buffettSmallPicWarren Buffet proposed the UN nuclear bank and made a self-serving "donation" of $50 million while demanding matching funds of $100 million from governments.  Obama provided $50 million in US taxpayer money and the EU, UAE, Kuwait and Norway made up the rest.  At $150 million, world domination is astonishingly cheap!  Buffett, a proponent of depopulation, was celebrated as a hero in the media because most people are ignorant about the UN's true goals.

Warren Buffett is in the energy utility business and owns MidAmerican Energy; his motivation for "donating" to the UN nuclear bank could benefit him later with regard to a UN monopoly over nuclear power for electricity. 

Taxpayers will ultimately fund the UN nuclear bank that is in opposition to public interest and freedom.  This trick is accomplished through foundations convincing governments to regulate or take action on an issue and then passing the cost on to taxpayers (click here to find out how individuals create public policy that has been used for depopulation).

Buffett proposed the UN nuclear bank through a foundation that he provides funding, called the 'Nuclear Threat Initiative' (NTI).  Ted Turner, known for supporting depopulation, is co-chairman of the Nuclear Threat Initiative and Sam Nunn, a former US Senator, is the other co-chair of NTI.  

NUCLEAR SECURITY PROJECT

Nunn is the front man working with Cold-War hawks Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State, George Schulz, former Defense Secretary and William Perry, former Secretary of State in the 'Nuclear Security Project' to dismantle nuclear weapons.  This project is supported by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell and many others.

Nunn, Kissinger, Schulz and Perry are aggressively pushing the dismantling of nuclear weapons through the US-Russia-UN START Treaty and the UN Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The objective of these types of treaties, according to Department of State Publication 7277, is to disarm states to a "point where no state would have the military power to challenge the strengthened UN Peace Force...."

Buffett has provided funding for the Nuclear Security Project, too.  Buffett said that an atomic attack on the US by mid-century is a "virtual certainty".  In my opinion, with psychopaths like Buffett, Turner and Kissinger (a Rockefeller lieutenant) at the helm, this is practically unavoidable.

CONCLUSION

UNnukesAs sovereign countries dismantle their nuclear weapons under UN treaties, the UN is simultaneously building its nuclear arsenal by way of the nuclear bank.

Additionally, the UN is locking in another uranium enrichment monopoly over nuclear power for electricity, which will also increase "interdependency of nations."

SOLUTIONS:

Michael Shaw, UN Agenda 21 expert and president of FreedomAdvocates.org, says:

The UN has a plethora of schemes to advance the goal of world government. The most important of these is Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. This is the global to local movement designed under the cover of green to transform our systems of government and economics. Every county in America has adopted its Sustainable plan moving us all closer to the one world order where your unalienable rights are no longer politically recognized.

While there is little the citizen can do to halt the UN’s control of uranium, the typical American can do much toward exposing the local application of the UN’s march under the local Agenda 21 protocol. In particular, Americans need to understand city alliances with the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). ICLEI is an NGO, accredited by the United Nations for the purpose of implementing Agenda 21 at the local level. Such contracts have been entered into by over 600 American cities. This is treasonous.

In short, the Sustainable objective is the abolition of private property, education for global citizenship, and the use of technology to control  human action. As ordinary people become aware of Agenda 21 hope rises that the Republic can be re-established and that then the US can sever its ties with the United Nations and end the globalists’ one world ambition.

For full analysis of Agenda 21 Sustainable Development visit www.FreedomAdvocates.org.

 

 


Add this to your website

Comments  

 
-4 #1 Tina Sullivan 2011-03-24 14:08
Excellent article Cassandra! It's just surreal to see how they've eroded our country and our Constitutional rights.
 
 
-6 #2 STOP AGENDA 21 2011-03-26 16:18
We encourage your readers to go to www.DemocratsAgainstUNAgenda21.com for more information on how their local governments are partnering with non-governmental organizations to restrict their rights.
The Post Sustainability Institute will be hosting a conference in Northern California this summer on the impacts that UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development and Communitarianis m have on their liberty.
 
 
-6 #3 Bob Burton 2011-03-27 06:47
Very good to be Against Agenda 21 ! But you cannot be Against anything from the UN and be a Republican or a democrat.. The UN through their NGO network owns both parties and contributes what ever it takes to put only UN NGO members up for office to the degree that no outsider could possibly compete. That is why the Un Judge and the UN Atty General have raided my home. If you google Judge greg Parker and Brookings you will find he is a long time facilitator of "Global Maretime Partnerships"GMPs he is as well legal council to the ICOC and president of the most powerful ag21 NGO of all Rotary International who holds the highest "Consultative Status" of any NGO at the UN. http://1787network.com/2011/01/breaking-news-whistleblowers-home-raided-by-armed-fdle-agents/
 
 
-4 #4 sadasivan 2011-04-16 14:13
The UN is now the USA with her poodles the UK and France.But it will be difficult for these three to coerce Russia and China to forego their Nukes,as they will become the Iraqs,Afghanist ans and Libyas.While,Buffet is ONLY a businessman,UN's Nuclear bank may at best serve as a commercial enterprise against nations like India which do not have Uranium in abundance or is unwilling to use the available quantity for political reasons[India's PM MM Singh is a suspected PLANT of the Rothschilds,IMF and the World Bank,and follows their diktats].
But Agenda 21 and the like pose serious threats to Nations'[other than Russia and China] Sovereignty.
 
 
-4 #5 Cassandra 2011-04-16 14:57
In response to Sadasivan:

The UN is funded by the USA, but certainly NOT seving the USA. The UN serves the globalist individuals who control monopolies. Click on the link about the START Treaty to see that Russia is indeed giving up its nuclear weapons (on par with the US). Buffett is much more than a business man, he is a social engineer and a monopoly owner (in the field of energy). The UN, at times, moves in slow incremental steps, so it IS more than a commercial venture- we should expect more treaties and regulations to lock countries into international laws around uranium enrichment. In fact, that was the original goal of the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
 
 
-2 #6 sewa mobil 2011-05-18 05:02
Nice article, thanks for the information.
 
 
-1 #7 Baju Wanita Online 2012-08-31 01:03
I love blog walking just like i found this article, it give me more knowledge, thank you Cassandra ! Busana Wanita Online
 
 
0 #8 google advertising 2014-03-14 23:56
Hi there it's me, I am also visiting this web site on a regular basis, this website is actually fastidious
and the people are really sharing fastidious thoughts.
 

Spread the word

Facebook MySpace Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Google Bookmarks RSS Feed 

Why MORPHcity?

MORPHcity exists for the purpose of putting a spotlight on important issues rarely, if ever, covered by the Mainstream Media, and hopes to offer up solutions to create a better world.