Geoengineering: Climate Ghouls' 'Plan B'
Print
PDF

By Cassandra Anderson
December 4, 2010

announcements_imageThe UN Climate talks in Cancun are now focusing on geoengineering, using it as a tool to extort a binding UN treaty to reduce phony global warming.  The AP reported today that "we may need geoengineering as a 'Plan B,' if nations fail to forge agreement on a binding treaty to rein in greenhouse gases", per a British House of Commons report. 

 

Geoengineering and contrived global warming lies are facets of Agenda 21, the overarching blueprint for control and depopulation.  The article states that geoengineering can cause rain precipitation and other weather changes.

The AP article revealed that the primary forces behind geoengineering are the UN, the US and the UK.  The US and the UK governments urged the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to study geoengineering, with the US in the research forefront.  The article says that "specialists regard the stratospheric sulfates proposal as among the most feasible"- this means chemtrails.   But instead of sulfates, patents and evidence indicate that aluminum and barium are currently being sprayed.  The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) will do the unreliable computer modeling tests for the US research.  Watch this video to understand that this is a depopulation program and this NOAA scientist advocates "doing whatever we can to reduce population".

The new willingness of the UN to consider geoengineering comes just weeks after the UN's Biodiversity conference in Japan wherein they imposed a moratorium on it until the implications could be fully studied. The UN used the 'moratorium' for support to gain global control over geoengineering and weather.  Notably, the US did not sign the UN Biodiversity Convention (another word for 'treaty') in favor of the moratorium and UN control.

The UK government hosts the Hadley Center at East Anglia University, the home-base of the UN IPCC and is known for the 'Climategate' scandal and manipulated science.   Margaret Thatcher established Hadley Center to usher in globalism and to weaken US power.  The UN IPCC will pay off hundreds of scientists to study geoengineering for the IPCC's next assessment report.   The UK supports UN control over geoengineering.

Sylvia Ribeiro of ETC was responsible for the UN short-lived moratorium promise on geoengineering at the Biodiversity Convention.  She said that the UN must control geoengineering.  Her 501(c)3 organization, ETC, has been funded by the likes of the Ford Foundation (known for supporting depopulation) and the HKH Foundation that funds other extreme environmental groups (Tides Foundation, NRDC, Union of Concerned Scientists, etc) with ties to the UN.

Foundations and depopulation policy makers are deeply intertwined; the UN IPCC sets public policy directly and indirectly.  An example of this is UN IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri who is married to Saroj Pachauri, a director of the Rockefeller founded Population Council and she also worked for the Ford Foundation.  While Rajendra may be concerned about the effects of geoengineering, his wife works to limit population.

The article reports that scientists say warming is being caused by greenhouse gases emitted by industry, vehicles and agriculture.  The truth is that only a fraction of 1% of carbon emissions comes from these sources and agriculture, industry and transportation are targets for control.  Food production is a depopulation focal point and changes in precipitation affects food.

Ocean acidification is another global warming lie.  Geoengineering iron seeding or fertilization in the oceans can produce toxic algae blooms and would have little effect on carbon reduction.

Britain's national science academy said that the greatest challenges to geoengineering may not be science and engineering, but social ethical, legal and political issues.  It is a problem for the depopulation ghouls that many people are aware of the potential effects of chemtrails and are angry about being sprayed like bugs.

Visit MorphCity.com for more information on food as a weapon and other Agenda 21 issues.


Add this to your website

Comments  

 
+6 #1 Richard Lefew 2010-12-04 22:23
God help us. . . Neo Malthusians at the helm. The idea that population is out of control is certainly not a new one. . . and again, as it was wrong in the days of Malthus, it's again wrong now. Here in the U.S. our population would be falling if it weren't for immigration. Families are not reproducing fast enough to replace themselves in developed countries. This is why the governments of developed countries won't do anything about illegal immigration.

Chemtrails are real, and they are designed to degrade the environment to the point of being unable to sustain the population. The Neo Malthusians got tired of waiting for the environmental collapse that never happened, so they decided to cause the collapse themselves by shutting out the sun.
 
 
-12 #2 Milly 2010-12-05 02:55
Whilst I totally deplore any idea that people should in any way be eliminated I think it is wrong not to believe the planet has reached saturation point when it comes to global population.
There has to be a finite point and we have reached it. There is a finite point on the resources of the planet and we have to get real.
We do need population control and the idea that just because a country isn't completely filled to busting point there is somehow room for yet more humanity is unacceptable.
Perhaps some thought should be given to other species who occupy this world and their need for space.
 
 
-5 #3 Fallentree 2010-12-05 05:52
Good Lord!! Who makes the final decision on depopulation? Bureaucrats?

Where is the outrage? Find out who these people are & found out where they work so we can send letters of protest.

We need to defend ourselves as these AMericans did in a new book out. It's a must read cause it's about each of us & our families. Need to read this!

www.booksbyoliver.com


How involved is our own government in any decision about depopulating the world? This is just too scary!
 
 
-8 #4 John Taylor 2010-12-05 07:27
Please explain this to me. Globalists are pushing for Amnesty and the Dream law in the United States. Canada immigrates 3% of it's population each year. This brings people at 3rd world energy consumption levels to 1st world consumption levels which seems to be what they don't want. First world energy consumption continue to rise thanks to globalist policies. The "new" americans replicate faster than the indigineous populate so this exacerbates the problem further.
This seems to contradict the stated aim of the globalists to reduce energy consumption on our planet. Then what is the real objective of the globalists?
 
 
0 #5 Cassandra 2010-12-05 08:14
[quote name="Milly"]Whilst I totally deplore any idea that people should in any way be eliminated I think it is wrong not to believe the planet has reached saturation point when it comes to global population.

Hi Milly:

According to the UN's own documents, the population will plateau off at 9 billion- without any extra "help" from depopulation enthusiasts. Most resources are renewable (food, water, etc), but gross mismanagement promotes poverty and lack of essentials in most cases. For example, 48% of deliverable water in CA is under federal jurisdiction and goes to "environmental" purposes, which means it gets spilled into the Pacific Ocean. It's about control. Please read the ESA section under Agenda 21 to understand that 'endangered specie' are another tool of control. ZERO species have been saved as a result of regulations stemming from the ESA.
 
 
-15 #6 thepostman 2010-12-05 08:15
There's hope yet. When I created my timeline (http://hemptruth.150m.com/the_timeline.htm) about 10 years ago, I never thought that people would come to equate rabid environmentalis m with population reduction. I was wrong. Thank God!

Read/Learn/Live

Postman
 
 
-22 #7 Wayne Hall 2010-12-05 10:13
ETC and Hands off Mother Earth are the only mainstream interlocutors the anti-chemtrails movement should be prepared to accept. Climate scientists not supporting H.O.M.E. should be boycotted, snubbed, opposed wherever possible.

Chemtrails activists should be asking their governments why they signed the moratorium if they are not abiding by it.

We should impose the condition collaboration with the activists of ETC and Hands off Mother Earth that these scientists should not talk to the media about whether or not chemtrails are a reality.

The goal should be to stop the public arguing about climate and get them arguing about geoengineering.

BOTH sides of the climate debate largely originate in the same nuclear weapons laboratories.

To support the climate change sceptics is counterproducti ve because there are NO prominent climate change sceptics coming out in opposition to geoengineering.
 
 
-7 #8 Peter 2010-12-05 10:41
Fake global warming, yet another violation of our rights. Add it to the list of gov’t violations of our right:
They violate the 1st Amendment by placing protesters in cages, banning books like “America Deceived II” and censoring the internet.
They violate the 2nd Amendment by confiscating guns.
They violate the 4th and 5th Amendment by molesting airline passengers.
They violate the entire Constitution by starting undeclared wars for foreign countries.
Impeach Obama and sweep out the Congress, except Ron Paul.
(Last link of Banned Book):
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000190526
 
 
-10 #9 Ms. Anne Thrope 2010-12-05 10:47
Quoting Milly:
Whilst I totally deplore any idea that people should in any way be eliminated I think it is wrong not to believe the planet has reached saturation point when it comes to global population.
There has to be a finite point and we have reached it. There is a finite point on the resources of the planet and we have to get real.
We do need population control and the idea that just because a country isn't completely filled to busting point there is somehow room for yet more humanity is unacceptable.
Perhaps some thought should be given to other species who occupy this world and their need for space.


I'm totally with you on this one, Milly. Very well written. Thanks, and let us hope other people will 'get it' finally and see that this is true. Humanity is a scourge upon the Earth, unfortunately. This can change and must change eventually, but only with our help and cooperation will it happen.
 
 
+4 #10 Johnny de Vulcan 2010-12-05 11:30
Seeing so clearly the need for depopulation and expressing a pro :sigh: found empathy with the idea, Milly and Thorpe will be the first to go voluntarily. R.I.P.
 

Spread the word

Facebook MySpace Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Google Bookmarks RSS Feed 

Why MORPHcity?

MORPHcity exists for the purpose of putting a spotlight on important issues rarely, if ever, covered by the Mainstream Media, and hopes to offer up solutions to create a better world.